QuitamOnline — False Claims Act whistleblower guide

Medicare Therapy Fraud: PT, OT, and Speech Billing Abuse

How Medicare therapy fraud works in SNFs, home health, and outpatient settings — inflated minutes, medically unnecessary treatment, and FCA enforcement trends.

Updated 2026-09-093 min readEducational guide — not legal advice
1

Therapy as a billing driver

Medicare pays separately or through bundled rates for physical, occupational, and speech therapy. Facilities where therapy revenue drives margins may push clinicians to document more minutes than delivered or treat patients who cannot benefit.

2

Billing patterns and the payment rules that apply

Examples of potential problems include recording treatment that did not occur, misrepresenting one-to-one versus group treatment, and billing care without supporting documentation. Whether a claim is improper depends on the setting and applicable coverage rules.

Historical skilled nursing cases sometimes involved RUG-IV therapy-minute thresholds. CMS replaced that SNF Part A classification with PDPM in October 2019. A historical ultra-high therapy category should not be presented as the current universal Medicare billing model.

3

Insider witnesses

Therapists asked to sign off on minutes they did not perform, or told that patient tolerance does not matter for billing targets, may be witnessing fraud — not just aggressive business practices.

4

FCA enforcement

Therapy fraud cases often combine medical necessity falsehoods with false claims for payment. Relators with documentation of corporate policies tying bonuses to therapy volume have helped DOJ recover millions.

Key takeaways

  • Compare the therapy billed with the service documented and delivered.
  • Historical RUG-IV minute incentives should not be confused with current PDPM payment.
  • Medical necessity and accurate documentation matter across payment settings.

Sources and official guidance